|
APPENDIX III - Nonpoint Source Pollution
Assessment
Historically, most water quality
problems in Florida were associated with point sources, including
both domestic and industrial sources. Nonpoint sources have now
been determined to account for the majority of the state's water
quality problems. This change is due primarily to point source treatment
improvements and increases in agriculture and urban developed land
(Hand and Paulic 1992). NPS pollution has also been identified as
the major factor affecting downstream water quality in about 80
percent of the urban areas targeted in a national survey conducted
by the Council on Environmental Quality (1972).
NPS pollution is a major, largely
uncontrolled, cause of surface water degradation throughout Florida
(Livingston et al. 1989). NPS pollutants in northwest Florida include
pesticides, animal wastes, nutrients, and sediments (Wolfe et al.
1988). In north Florida, the progression of natural ecosystems to
silvicultural, agricultural, and urban uses has resulted in NPS
pollution impacts including increased peak and total discharge,
increased concentrations of dissolved solids, nitrates, and ammonia,
and increased export rates of pollutants during storms (Livingston
et al. 1989).Major contributors of these pollutants include agriculture,
stormwater runoff, silviculture, landfills, and septic tanks (US
EPA 1989). Land use type and intensity are strongly related to NPS
concentrations.
Contaminants associated with NPS
can be detrimental to water quality. Nutrients can have direct toxic
effects or may stimulate algal growth. Pesticides and other contaminants
can be dangerous to the aquatic ecosystem.
Sediments affect water ways by not
only reducing their storage capacity but also by increasing the
temperature of the water and providing increased opportunities for
the growth of water consuming plants (Clark et al. 1985). Additional
sediment impacts include damage to the biological health and integrity
of the aquatic ecosystem along with a decrease in recreational and
aesthetic values.
Stormwater runoff is a significant
source of NPS pollution, having solids concentrations equal to or
greater than untreated sanitary wastewater, and biological oxygen
demand (BOD) values approximately equal to those of secondary effluent.
Suspended sediment loads from streams draining urban areas are often
an order of magnitude greater than those from nearby forested watersheds
(Burton et al. 1977b). In addition, bacterial contamination of stormwater
may be two to four orders of magnitude greater than concentrations
considered safe for water contact (Field and Turkeltaub 1981).
Urbanization has been shown to fundamentally
alter the hydrology of watersheds (Anderson 1970). Increases in
impervious surface areas result in substantially increased runoff
(Simmons and Reynolds 1982, McElroy 1978). In addition, urbanization,
with the associated land clearing and paving of pervious areas,
has accelerated the problem of water quality deterioration throughout
Florida. Stormwater and associated NPS pollution are responsible
for:
1. 80-90 percent of the heavy metals
deposited in Florida surface waters;
2. the majority of the sediment
deposited in state waters; and 3.450 times the Total Suspended
Solids flowing to receiving waters and nine times the BOD load
when compared to loads from secondarily-treated wastewater effluent
(Livingston et al. 1989).
Water quality changes due to urbanization
also affect wildlife habitat. Jones and Clark (1987) indicated biological
data were a better discriminator of urbanization stress on an ecological
system than chemical parameters used in the same study.
METHODS
Basin boundaries, land use and land
cover data, and selected loading rates were input and processed
using the District ARC/INFO GIS. Land use and land cover acreage
within the watershed were used in combination with selected loading
rates to estimate total loadings by land use.
Satellite imagery and aerial photography
were used to quantify existing land use and land cover in the St.
Marks and Wakulla Rivers watershed. Potential NPS pollutant loading
rates were estimated for existing land use and land cover classes.
Due to staffing constraints, Local Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use Maps (FLUM) and future development scenarios were not included.
Loading rate relationships were determined for four water quality
parameters. Selected loadings were applied to each land use and
land cover class and total loads were estimated. Specific areas
with exceptionally high loadings were identified.
Land Use Categories and NPS Loading
Rates
Existing land use and land cover
within the St. Marks and Wakulla Rivers watershed were initially
classified into more than 40 categories which included similar land
use and land cover types. Due to the impracticality of developing
and applying 39 individual loading rates, original categories were
aggregated into 15 categories, based on similarities in loading
characteristics ( see Table A-3).
Previous NPS pollution studies were
reviewed to corroborate loading rate estimates for water quality
parameters and land use categories (Rains, et al. 1993). Loading
rates for land use/cover categories were based on three studies,
the Tampa Bay Watershed Study (Dames and Moore 1990), Florida Department
of Environmental Regulation's Watershed Model Users Manual (Camp,
Dresser and McKee 1991), and Reikerk (1983).
Loading rates for TN, TP, TSS, and
BOD calculations were based on average annual rainfall (inches/acre/year),
pollutant runoff coefficient (includes soil type, perviousness,
etc.), pollutant runoff concentrations (milligrams/liter), by land
use, and St. Marks and Wakulla Rivers mean annual rainfall (58 inches/year).
Loading rates were reported in pounds per acre per year (lbs/acre/yr),
and total loadings were reported in pounds/year (lbs/yr). Loading
rates for TN, TP, BOD, and TSS were estimated for each land use
category in developing composite loading rate relationships. Determining
whether or not land uses met water quality standards was not within
the scope of this study.
Loading rates from three studies
(see Table A-4) were selected for use in the NPS assessment. All
loading rate calculations were based on local rainfall data . Rainfall
data for a five year period from the closest available rainfall
stations, (Tallahassee and Wewahitchka) were used to identify an
watershed average annual rainfall as 58 inches. (A summary of the
11 studies considered for their potential applicability to northwest
Florida is provided in Appendix II).
TN and TP loading rates for four
of the land use categories (institutional, transportation/utilities,
tree plantations, and natural uplands), were derived from FDEP's
Watershed Model Users Manual (Camp Dresser and McKee 1991). The
manual provided event-mean concentrations based on percent impervious
surface associated with land uses. TN and TP loading rates used
to calculate loadings were determined by multiplying a weighted
runoff coefficient by average annual rainfall (USGS gauging station)
and event-mean concentrations from the Dames and Moore report (1990),
FDEP documents, or estimated based on similar land use (see Table
A-5).
Table A-3. FLUCCS codes for
each existing land use and cover category in the St Marks and Wakulla
Rivers watershed. Aggregated categories were based on existing
land use categories and compatibility
with future land use categories.
| Existing
FLUCCS Categories |
Existing
Aggregated Categories |
|
|
| Residential |
Residential |
| Low
density residential |
Low
density residential |
| Medium
density residential |
Medium
density residential |
| High
density residential |
High
density residential |
| Commercial/services |
|
|
Commercial |
| Industrial |
Industrial |
| Extractive |
Extractive |
| Institutional |
Institutional |
| Transportation |
Transportation/utilities |
| Utilities |
|
|
|
| Recreation |
Recreation/open
lands |
| Open
lands (urban) |
|
|
|
| Sand
other than beaches |
Spoil |
| Disturbed
land/spoil areas |
|
|
|
| Cropland/pasture |
Cropland/pasture |
| Open
lands (agriculture) |
|
| Shrub/brushland |
|
|
|
| Upland
coniferous forest |
Upland
forests |
| Upland
hardwood forest |
|
| Upland
mixed coniferous/hardwood forest |
|
|
|
| Tree
plantation |
Silviculture |
| Forest
regeneration |
|
|
|
| Streams/waterways |
Streams
and lakes |
| Lakes |
|
|
|
| Wetland
hardwood forest |
Wetlands |
| Gum
swamps |
|
| Titi
swamps |
|
| Inland
ponds/sloughs |
|
| Wetland
mixed hardwood forest |
|
| Cypress |
|
| Wetland
mixed coniferous forest |
|
| Wetland
mixed coniferous/hardwood forest |
|
| Freshwater
marshes |
|
| Saltwater
marshes |
|
| Non-vegetated
wetland |
|
|
|
| Not
applicable |
Conservation |
Table A - 4. Loading rates
(lbs/acre/yr) for land use categories in the St Marks and Wakulla
Rivers Watershed .
BORDER=1 CELLSPACING=1> Land
use TN TP BOD TSS Urban Low
density residential 5.76 0.74 16.12 55.90 Med density residential
10.10 1.63 37.22 100.03 High density residential 19.49 4.36 98.31
677.05 Commercial 21.10 3.14 130.90 894.67 Industrial 17.90 3.10
95.99 935.87 Institutional 5.55 0.71 73.51 475.29 Recreation/open
2.76 0.12 3.20 24.49 Non-urban Cropland/pasture 8.89 1.32
14.57 211.97 Upland forest 2.67 0.42 8.89 118.23 Silviculture 2.67
0.42 8.89 118.23 Lakes and streams 7.88 0.69 10.69 19.54 Wetlands
4.54 0.54 13.33 28.94 Spoil/barren 4.06 0.40 23.45 225.95 Extractive
5.37 0.68 43.70 427.41 Transportation/utilities 8.00 1.01 67.10
459.60
Table A-5. References on which
loading rate estimates were based for the St Marks and Wakulla Rivers
watershed.
| Land
cover category |
TN |
TP |
BOD |
TSS |
|
|
|
|
|
| Urban |
|
|
|
|
| Low
density residential |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Industrial |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Institutional |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Recreation/open |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-urban |
|
|
|
|
| Cropland/pasture |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Upland
forest |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
| Silviculture |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
| Lakes
and streams |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Wetlands |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Spoil/barren |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
| Extractive |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Transportation/utilities |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Dames and Moore
2. Riekerk
3. Watershed Management Model
4. NWFWMD: derived from 1-3
Silviculture TN and TP loading rates were based on those reported
by Riekerk (1988). In a study of impacts of tree regeneration on
water quality, Riekerk (1988) reported total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)
as the predominant nitrogen form in tree regeneration runoff. Because
of the small nitrate differences in tree regeneration runoff due
to variations in silvicultural techniques, TKN was used as an estimate
of TN for this report.
The BOD and TSS loading rate estimates
for the institutional category were calculated as the average of
low density residential and commercial category rates. In order
to be consistent with FLUCCS land use system, the transportation/utilities
category was included in the NPS loadings tables. This category
included only major road systems since loading rates for a given
land use include roads and other infrastructure associated with
the land use. Transportation/utilities category loading rates for
BOD and TSS were calculated as the average of recreational/open
and commercial category rates.
In the ECFRPC Areawide 208 Study,
all waterbodies are assumed to have a runoff coefficient of 1.0
(Dames and Moore 1990). Many waterbodies, however, discharge only
under extreme rain events, and some are landlocked with no discharge.
Mean runoff value of 0.50 was selected, although varying characteristics
made estimation of a representative runoff value for waterbodies
difficult.
NPS Total Loadings
Urban. Total acreage for urban land
use categories accounted for only 7 percent (13,439 acres) of the
area in the St. Marks and Wakulla Rivers watershed (Table A-7, Figure
6 in the main body), while estimated TN, TP, and BOD loadings (Table
A-7) for urban categories accounted for 11 percent and 14 percent
of the total loadings in the watershed. Of the TN, TP, and BOD loadings
associated with urban land uses, 8 percent was associated with low
density residential and approximately 1-3 percent were due to commercial
and industrial. Urban TSS loadings accounted for only 7 percent
of the total TSS loadings in the watershed, and three percent were
due to low density residential.
Lowest estimated TN loadings were
less than one percent and ranged from 153 pounds per year for institutional
(See Table A-7). TP loadings were less than 100 lbs/yr for the institutional,
recreation and open urban land categories. Estimated BOD and TSS
were also lowest, and similar, for recreation and open urban lands.
Non-urban. Non-urban categories accounted
for 85 percent to 93 percent of total estimated loadings for each
of the four NPS pollutants (see Table A-7). Non-urban categories
accounted for 93 percent of the total acreage in the St. Marks and
Wakulla Rivers watershed. Silviculture areas in the St. Marks and
Wakulla Rivers watershed
accounted for 35 percent of the watershed
and accounted for 39 percent (Table A-7) of the estimated total
suspended solids associated with NPS pollutants in the St. Marks
and Wakulla Rivers watershed. Estimated TN, TP, and BOD associated
with silviculture accounted for 24 percent to 29 percent of the
total estimated NPS loadings for these parameters. Natural upland
forests made up 25 percent of the watershed acreage. Upland forest
estimated TSS loadings were second to those of silviculture.
The agriculture category made up
10 percent of the total acreage in St. Marks and Wakulla Rivers
watershed and contributed 13 percent to 24 percent of the total
estimated TN, TP, and BOD loadings (Table A-7). Agriculture loadings
estimated for TN (178,470 lbs/yr), TP (26,499 lbs/yr), and BOD (292,498
lbs/yr) were second to those for silviculture (Table A 7).
Estimated NPS loadings for wetlands
were similar (TN = 163,590 lbs/yr; TP = 19,458 lbs/yr; BOD = 480,319
lbs/yr; TSS = 1,042,794 lbs/yr) when compared with values for silviculture
and wetlands. Remaining land use categories contributed less than
five percent of the total loadings for any of the four individual
parameters (Table A-7) and were consistent with low acreage.
The transportation/utilities category
included less than 1 percent of the acreage in the St. Marks and
Wakulla Rivers watershed (Table A-7) and corresponded primarily
to acreage of major roadways. Estimated loadings due to major roadways
made up less than one percent of the total estimated loadings (see
Table A-7).
Total existing urban land use acreage
accounted for 7 percent of the area within the St. Marks and Wakulla
Rivers watershed and estimated NPS urban loadings ranged from nine
percent to 11 percent of total TN, TP, and BOD loadings, and 4 percent
of the total TSS loadings. Potential per-acre water quality impacts
appeared greatest for the commercial and industrial urban land use
categories. Overall relationships among categories were consistent
with other studies (Wanielista 1975, Hand and Paulic 1992) in which
urban land use categories had higher TN, TP, TSS, and BOD values
in surface water runoff when compared with values for non-urban
runoff.
Although loading rates for non-urban
categories were comparatively low on a per- acre basis, silviculture
practices have tremendous potential water quality impacts in the
St. Marks and Wakulla Rivers watershed due to the amount of acreage
and existing land practices.
In contrast with urban land uses,
silviculture included 36 percent of the watershed acreage and 39
percent of the total TSS loadings. These findings are consistent
with reports in the literature regarding suspended solids runoff
from silviculture areas. Variation in nutrient and sediment loadings
amounting to several orders of magnitude are common for forestry
activities (Novotny et al. 1981), and TSS loadings from logging
roads are significantly greater in the absence of appropriate BMPs
(Lynch and Corbett 1990). Most sediment reaching waterways from
these lands originate from construction of logging roads and from
clearcuts which infringe upon natural drainage channels (Novotny
1981).
Water quality maintenance and control
are normally achieved by implementing BMPs to reduce extreme pollution
problems and promote rapid recovery. The BMPs are intended to control
activities in stormflow source areas and promote acceptable road
construction and soil conservation practices.
Results of this assessment reflect
several areas of concern regarding NPS pollution in the St. Marks
and Wakulla Rivers watershed. First, forestry and agriculture are
responsible for the largest proportions of NPS pollution in the
watershed. Secondly, while the literature indicates water quality
impacts associated with these activities can be minimized through
recommended BMPs, compliance with these practices is not easily
enforced.
The impacts of silviculture and agriculture
activities can be substantially reduced if recommended BMPs are
comprehensively implemented and rigorously enforced. After evaluating
the results of forest BMP surveys the Florida Department of Agriculture
reported: "Of the 150 survey sites for 1991, 141 were found
to be in compliance with silviculture BMPs which equates to 94 percent
compliance",(Florida Department of Agriculture 1991) While
many appropriate BMPs were implemented, most surveyed sites had
several instances of non-compliance.
In an effort to clarify the use and
interpretation of BMPs and make their application more consistent,
Florida forestry BMPs have recently undergone substantial revision
to increase water resource protection. If these changes are successful
and compliance with revised BMPs is achieved, a reduction in NPS
loadings from silviculture can be expected. The Division of Forestry
is currently reassessing compliance and effectiveness of BMPs in
an effort to more accurately reflect BMP compliance.
Three general options exist for abating
NPS pollution from urban activity. The options involve prevention,
treatment, and control measures, implemented as an integrated abatement
approach (Wanielista 1975). In brief, prevention involves practices
that are applied before problems arise; treatment involves complete
or partial physical, chemical, and/or biological processes for minimizing
impacts of stormwater; and control measures would involve reduction
or control of pollution sources.
Ideally, limiting discharges from
new developments to discharge that would have occurred under natural,
undeveloped conditions, in addition to maintaining water quality
standards, should result in no increases in NPS pollution.
BACK NEXT
|